I cringed when I read this job description:
"Looking for 10+ years of experience, strong leadership skills, and excellent communication abilities."
Another vanilla posting destined to attract mediocre candidates.
Three months and 127 interviews later, the role was still unfilled. They'd churned through two recruiters and countless team hours, drowning in a sea of underwhelming resumes.
Most companies treat hiring like throwing darts blindfolded—posting job descriptions and then wading through hundreds of applications, praying to find the perfect candidate.
Last year, I watched a friend's company upend this conventional wisdom. They had their executive assistant do the initial heavy lifting of finding and qualifying candidates through two methods:
They worked with their assistant to dissect LinkedIn profiles. For each role, she mapped the career trajectories of 15-20 people crushing it at companies they admired. Not just scanning titles — but excavating the patterns and specific experience.
The observations were insightful.
Take their Head of Sales search. The most successful leaders followed a distinct path:
Sometimes there was a straightforward trajectory in a role, but many times there are multiple paths to success that need to be mapped out.
As an example using Brand Marketing, it may look something like this…
Path 1: Agency route
Path 2: CPG brand management
Understanding these different paths helped them evaluate candidates more effectively, weighing the trade-offs of each background. For example:
But the real magic happened when their assistant also unearthed the wildcards – those who carved unconventional paths to success. They started allocating 10-20% of the candidate pool to these “higher risk, higher upside” candidates. They looked for the underlying skills and experience, even in seemingly unrelated fields.
A Head of Engineering who emerged from management consulting. A Chief Marketing Officer who cut their teeth in journalism.
While it’s difficult to find wildcards with demonstrated experience, they: 1) reserved a portion of the candidate pool to try to recruit passive candidates who are currently in the role at another company; 2) made room for some candidates with wildly impressive experience that wasn’t traditional but perhaps had strong experience in adjacent areas.
Lastly, to further evaluate wildcards, they did extensive case interviewing to complement this higher risk tactic.
One measures time served. The other measures impact delivered.
This inverts the traditional hiring playbook. Rather than posting and praying, you're armed with a precise blueprint of what excellence looks like in action.
To summarize: